Skip to main content

The psychological impact of TV


TV is no doubt one of the greatest inventions of all time. We can see things even if it's not real. We can view scenarios of different countries just by chilling on the couch. According to a study, we tend to get attracted to visuals easily. We visualize what we see and our brain grasps the visuals within seconds. TV sometimes can affect the cognitive tendency of a human. We think positively if we see positive, and the same goes for negative thinking. What we prefer to watch on TV describes our personality as a human. TV is a boon but excess of everything is toxic and the same phrase applies to TV as well.


TV provides a large amount of information via an attractive visual mode, becoming one of the most powerful tools for instructions. Educational programs for kids emphasise on mental growth of kids and adults developing constructive mental attitudes. While some educational programs focus on mental growth, some programs may disturb mental peace. Every coin has two sides. Some programs may disturb the ability to concentrate and focus on positive aspects. TV not only affect the psychological state of mind but it affects our body as well.  According to a survey in 2020, TV is one of the major causes of obesity in children these days. Children stopped/reduced playing outdoor games by spending major time of the day in front of the TV. Reduction in reading and writing skills has disturbed mental growth, especially in children adversely. Greater aggressiveness in minor viewers is linked to watching violent shows on TV. As children are not mature enough to think of consequences, they just imitate. Consumerist attitude has developed a lot these days because several products are endorsed more realistically and naturally which affects the purchasing mentality of the audience. 


However, because there is TV, children and parents are distracted from talking, and in such a way suffer from communication. Television influences various spheres of family life “leisure relations, aesthetic interests and values, consumer behaviour patterns, parent-child attitudes and socialization practices”. Television is an accepted, approved and readily accessible source of information, and it both creates and reinforces models of social behaviour (style of dress, idiomatic language, attitudes toward sexuality and gender, parent behaviour) that define not only individual behaviour, but also family behaviour.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“The one where I lost a FRIEND”

  “ So no one told you life was gonna be this way, Your job is a joke, you're broke, Your love life is D.O.A, It's like you're always stuck in second gear, When it hasn't been your day, your week your month, Or even your year… but…. I'll be there for you, When the rain starts to pour, I'll be there for you, Like I've been there before, I'll be there for you, Cause you're there for me too” The song might sound familiar to lot many, and for those who don't know what I'm talking about will understand in few minutes, just hang in there… The story dates back to 2022, when I was all alone and the darkness in my mind hovering over my intrusive thoughts. I was surviving on anti-depressants and multiple therapies since last couple of years. Wandering through the browsers and social media, i discovered something I didn't knew I needed. It was the sitcom series F.R.I.E.N.D.S, I know it's childish but guess what!!! I bought yearly Netflix subscri...

Why and how “70 hours work a week” is violation of International Labour Standards

Recent statement by the founder of Infosys, Mr. Narayan Murthy “youngsters should work atleast 70 hours a week for the better” evoked controversies in corporate world and among the youth. The statement in itself is debatable and controversial and raged anger among the youths, saying “its for the company’s benefit and not for youth. Why is it a violation? With the twitter blowing up with tweets with mixed opinions, they believe Mr. Narayan Murthy made a factually incorrect statement that extended working hours helped advanced countries like Germany and Japan to succeed. Second, he placed the burden of increasing productivity on the shoulder of workers when the reality is that they have underinvested in innovation, the critical factor for raising productivity. Third, Mr. Narayana Murthy’s 70-hours week proposal violates  International Labor Standards (ILS) , the  International Labour Organization’s (ILO) Decent Work Agenda  and its  Fundamental Conventions  that l...